We know that the root causes of pay inequity for women and minorities vary greatly. One particular cause gaining the attention of employers and regulators is the practice of asking “current compensation” during the job interview, offer and negotiation stages. There is growing sentiment that asking for salary history is improper, overly intrusive and is likely to be unfair to minorities and women.
Our goal is to explore current hiring best practices in the social sector, perceptions among sector hiring executives and pose the question: what would salary negotiation look like if the practice of asking salary history was against the law.
A lower salary history has resulted in unfair pay practices as well as different people being paid different amounts for the same job. Women are less likely to recover from below market value early in their careers than their male counterparts.
Under the Pay Equity for All Act of 2016 (H.R. 6030), an employer could be subject to a fine of up to $10,000 if it asks questions about an applicant’s salary history.
________________________
We emailed 1,019 individuals inviting them to participate by following a link. The 42 replies established a response rate of 4.1 percent. We recruited an additional 64 participants via targeted ads on Facebook and LinkedIn. For incentives, we offered participants a $5 Starbucks gift card and an opportunity to win a $250 Amazon gift card.
________________________
To achieve a thorough and more robust variety of responses, we employed a variety of question formats in the survey, including Likert scale items. The survey’s descriptive results appear in terms of counts, percentages of total responses, and means, as applicable.
Organizational culture should accomodate those candidates who wish to keep their current salary private and compete on the basis of credentials and ability. Educating hiring managers on this approach will be a change effort worth doing. Women and minority colleagues will appreciate new policies aimed at erasing the pay gap issue.